Drugs, Health Technologies, Health Systems

Health Technology Review

Health System Readiness for Disease-Modifying Therapies for Alzheimer Disease

Key Messages

What Is the Issue?

What Did CDA-AMC Do?

What Did CDA-AMC Find?

What Does This Mean?

Abbreviations

AD

Alzheimer disease

AI

artificial intelligence

ARIA

amyloid-related imaging abnormalities

CADRO

Common Alzheimer’s Disease Research Ontology

CCCDTD

Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia

CSF

cerebrospinal fluid

DMT

disease-modifying therapy

GFAP

glial fibrillary acidic protein

LP

lumbar puncture

mAb

monoclonal antibody

MCI

mild cognitive impairment

MINT

multispecialty interprofessional team

NfL

neurofilament light chain

NICE

UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

p-tau

phosphorylated tau

PCP

primary care provider

Background

New DMTs using monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) may provide new treatment options for people with MCI and mild dementia due to early-stage AD. Unlike existing treatments that focus on managing the symptoms of AD or MCI, DMTs are intended to slow disease progression.4

Currently, no DMTs are approved for use in Canada for any type of dementia, but, if DMTs are approved by Health Canada, a surge in demand is possible. Resource implications are anticipated, as DMTs would place new requirements on the health care system for their optimal use.4,5

Objective

This report examines the readiness of health care systems in Canada for the potential introduction of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs. While there are several new AD therapies on the horizon, this report focuses on mAb DMTs targeting amyloid-beta in patients with early-stage AD, including MCI or mild dementia due to AD. In some countries, these therapies have received regulatory approval and positive recommendations for reimbursement and are being implemented in the health care system.

This report also explores emerging technologies that could enhance health systems’ efficiency in implementing anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs for AD and provides an estimate of the number of patients with incident early-stage AD who could receive treatment with anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs.

Approach

Information specialists conducted a tailored literature search, balancing comprehensiveness and relevance, across various sources, including a focused internet search conducted on March 8 and 9, 2024, as well as regular search updates. Content experts were consulted for input and peer review. This document delineates the current patient pathway for AD and outlines 4 domains of a potential future AD treatment pathway for novel anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs: assessment and diagnosis of early-stage AD, treatment eligibility assessment, treatment administration, and patient monitoring.

What Is the Context?

Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

Figure 1: Proportions of Common Causes of Dementia8

Pie chart shows the percentages of the population with dementia who have specific causes: 70% have Alzheimer disease, 20% have vascular dementia, 5% have Lewy body dementia, and 5% other types such as frontotemporal dementia and mixed dementia.

AD in the Context of Canada

Recent Developments in DMTs Using Monoclonal Antibodies for AD

Health System Readiness

The Patient Pathway

Currently, the diagnostic and treatment pathway for people with early-stage AD, which includes MCI and mild dementia due to AD, typically begins with the presentation of symptoms. However, a significant portion of the general public remains unaware of the symptoms of early-stage AD.34,35

Patients and their caregivers initially seek care from social care services or from a PCP who can recognize, assess, and diagnose AD, possibly collaborating with a dementia specialist if their expertise is required. Upon confirmation of early-stage AD, current treatments primarily focus on managing symptoms.

It is anticipated that a new model of care and clinical pathway for early-stage AD and additional public education and outreach campaigns may be needed for the successful implementation of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, if they are approved in Canada. The potential disease treatment pathway for anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs could encompass 4 clinical domains (Figure 2): assessment and diagnosis of early-stage AD, treatment eligibility assessment, treatment administration of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, and patient monitoring.

Assessment and Diagnosis of Early-Stage AD

The assessment and diagnosis domain of the clinical pathway may include identifying individuals at risk of AD who are experiencing cognitive symptoms in social care services or primary care settings and administering cognitive assessments through trained care providers. The expertise of dementia specialists and medical imaging professionals to confirm suspected diagnosis of early-stage AD via cognitive assessments and neuroimaging (i.e., MRI or CT exams) may also be required.

Treatment Eligibility Assessment

The treatment eligibility assessment domain of the clinical pathway may involve assessing whether people with early-stage AD are eligible to receive anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs. In countries where these therapies have been approved, assessment of individuals includes LP or amyloid PET scans to determine amyloid-beta positivity. Additionally, individuals are evaluated for susceptibility to adverse events, such as brain hemorrhages, using MRI and genotyping.

Treatment Administration of Anti–Amyloid-Beta mAb DMTs

The treatment administration domain of the clinical pathway would involve travel to and from an outpatient clinic. Individuals are administered anti–amyloid-beta mAb infusions at these clinics every 2 or 4 weeks.

Patient Monitoring

The treatment monitoring phase of the clinical pathway would be concurrent with treatment administration and involves regular MRI monitoring for adverse events, supervised by a specialist. The frequency of MRI monitoring may increase if symptoms of adverse events develop.

In addition, disease progression could also be monitored with cognitive tests and repeat amyloid PET and LP exams, to determine whether patients are still eligible for the therapy.

Assessment and Diagnosis of Early-Stage AD

Identifying MCI and AD and Seeking Help

Currently, clinical diagnosis of early-stage AD, encompassing MCI and mild dementia due to AD, involves a comprehensive evaluation by a trained primary health care professional, such as a family doctor or primary care nurse. This assessment requires a careful corroborated history of the onset of symptoms and progression from both the patient and caregiver, using pen-and-paper psychometric screening tools, in addition to neurologic exams.17,36,37 Novel anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs were designed for people with early-stage AD, underscoring the importance of diagnosing MCI or AD at an early stage to optimize treatment effectiveness.26

Figure 2: Potential Model of Care With DMTs for Patients With AD

An algorithm diagram showing steps in each of 4 domains of a model of care with disease-modifying treatments for patients with AD.

Current guidance from the CCCDTD does not recommend routine cognitive testing to screen older adults who are asymptomatic.17 However, these guidelines were published before the advent of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, and it is unclear how these recommendations would change in this new context. Up to 60% of dementia cases worldwide remain undetected, suggesting that many individuals with early-stage disease may be unaware of or are overlooking symptoms associated with early-stage AD.34,35 Public education and advocacy campaigns as well as additional support resources may create better public awareness and understanding of early-stage AD, its symptoms, and how it can be managed.38

With the potential introduction of new therapies offering the promise of slowing disease progression, more individuals may be motivated to seek screening, including those who may not necessarily be eligible.39 A recent survey from Alzheimer’s Disease International has reported that more than 90% of carers and the general public would be more likely to seek a diagnosis if DMTs were available.40 Jurisdictions in Canada may not be fully prepared for an increase in screening demand, given the challenges in accessing both primary and specialist care, as well as gaps in physician training for diagnosing early-stage AD. This highlights a significant gap in readiness to diagnose individuals at an early enough stage, should anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs be approved.7

Implementation considerations for identifying early-stage AD include the following:

Accessing Primary Care

The diagnostic pathway for early-stage AD begins when individuals or their caregivers recognize symptoms and seek medical attention. Current guidance in Canada suggests the pathway to diagnosis should begin at the primary care level.17

Implementation considerations for diagnosing early-stage AD and accessing primary care and treatment include the following:

Accessing Specialist Care and Receiving a Diagnosis

After seeking help in a primary care setting, individuals with symptoms of early-stage AD typically receive a final diagnosis from their PCP, without referral to a specialist, unless the cause of symptoms remains unclear or neuroimaging is required.17,41 However, if anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs are being considered as a treatment option for these individuals, confirmation of the diagnosis and evaluation of treatment eligibility would likely require the involvement of a dementia specialist. To facilitate shared decision-making, the benefits and risks of treatment should also be discussed between the patient and their caregiver, on the 1 hand, and a dementia specialist, on the other. The specialist would oversee the coordination of care and administration of treatment to ensure appropriate management.17,41

Accessing dementia specialists in Canada presents several challenges:

Future Diagnostic Technologies

A variety of new and emerging technologies have been developed or are currently in development to improve the identification of early-stage AD. The adoption of digital cognitive tests, ocular biomarkers, and artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to enhance health system efficiencies by replacing pen-and-paper psychometric screening methods. While these technologies are showing promise in research settings, their widespread clinical adoption depends on further validation, regulatory approvals, and integration into health care systems.

Digitization of Cognitive Tests

The digitization of cognitive screening tools has the potential to transform patient screening by enabling broader access, integrating real-time data, tracking cognitive trends, and reducing clinician workload.36,98 A shift toward digital platforms has the potential to improve early diagnosis and monitoring, facilitating more effective management of early-stage AD.

Developments in the digital administration of cognitive screening tools include:

While these digital platforms have the potential to enhance early diagnosis and monitoring, particularly in early-stage AD, traditional cognitive testing may still play an important role, especially for patients and care providers who may not have access to, or be comfortable operating, digital devices. Ensuring equitable access to cognitive assessments will likely require a balance between digital innovations and traditional approaches.

Ocular Biomarkers and Retinal Imaging Technologies

In recent years, some AD research has focused on potential biomarkers correlated with AD development that occur biologically in the eye or are related to functionality of the eye. AI use in conjunction with ocular biomarkers of AD, including tears, corneal nerves, retina, visual function, and eye movement tracking, may be able to detect early-stage AD. This technology may improve the accuracy of identifying AD and could become a screening tool to detect AD before symptoms develop.101

Recent developments to advance ocular diagnostics in MCI and AD include the following:

Despite these advances, barriers to implementing ocular diagnostics may persist. These include a lack of consensus on clinical integration strategies and limited understanding of the relationship between retinal changes and AD, underscoring the need for further research.105 Additionally, challenges such as the need for specialized training for eye care professionals and variations in optometrists' scope of practice across provinces would need to be addressed.

AI Detection and Machine Learning

AI and machine-learning models, especially those that optimize MRI scans, have the potential to improve diagnostic processes. These technologies have the capability to analyze neuroimaging data with greater precision, detecting subtle brain changes that indicate AD and standardizing pattern identification for radiologists, potentially reducing the need for specialized training. This capability could lead to earlier and more accurate AD diagnoses, distinguishing it from other neurologic conditions.106-110 However, an important consideration, discussed later in this report, is the need to address implementation challenges associated with MRI access.

Additionally, other key considerations and challenges include the following:

These advances underscore the potential of AI to support AD diagnosis and care and highlight the importance of addressing ethical, technical, and practical challenges to maximize their benefits in health care settings.111

Recent developments in AI detection and machine learning include the following:

Treatment Eligibility Assessment

Once diagnosed with early-stage AD, which includes MCI and mild dementia due to AD, individuals would undergo assessment for treatment options, including anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, if approved by Health Canada. In countries where these therapies are approved, regulatory authorities typically require patients to have abnormal levels of amyloid-beta pathology to be eligible for treatment.28,29 For example, 21% to 40% of people with MCI do not display enough amyloid-beta biomarker load to confirm a diagnosis of AD.112,113 These amyloid-beta levels are currently determined by an amyloid PET exam or an analysis of CSF obtained via LP.114 The required amyloid-beta levels for eligibility may vary among different anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, and clinicians would need training to discern the nuances among these therapies.115

The CCCDTD does not currently recommend amyloid PET exams or LPs as a regular part of the diagnosis pathway for early-stage AD unless there is diagnostic uncertainty. However, the CCCDTD recommendations were made in 2020, before the introduction of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs as a potential AD treatment.17 Integrating these forms of testing may involve considerations of appropriate use, equitable access, and additional training for PCPs and dementia and neuroimaging specialists in the health care systems in Canada.

In addition to determining biomarker levels, regulatory authorities in countries that have approved anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs have also required an MRI scan within 12 months before treatment initiation and suggested APOE genotyping to evaluate patients’ predisposition to adverse events.114 After patients complete treatment eligibility testing, dementia specialists would have to review the results and determine the treatment plan.4

CSF Analysis and LPs

CSF collection via LP is considered a convenient and cost-effective method to determine amyloid-beta levels compared to amyloid PET exams, primarily due to its lower resource requirements.116 The procedure requires basic equipment, consisting of a LP kit, which includes a needle and collection tube, making it more accessible for individuals living in rural or remote areas.117 In some provinces, both PCPs and nurses can perform LPs, although additional training would likely be required.118-121

Most often, LPs are performed in the hospital setting by neurologists.118 While these procedures could be conducted in outpatient settings, which could improve access in the health care system, this would necessitate appropriate training to ensure the procedure is conducted safely.117,122 An additional advantage of LP, compared to amyloid PET, is that CSF assays can examine multiple different biomarkers concurrently.117 However, the CCCDTD does not recommend CSF testing and LPs as part of the routine diagnosis pathway unless there is diagnostic uncertainty in people under the age of 65.17

Implementing CSF analysis via LPs may present several challenges, and these include the following:

Amyloid PET Imaging

PET-CT is an advanced, hybrid, diagnostic imaging modality that combines PET and CT imaging in a single unit. This modality uses radiopharmaceuticals to attach to AD biomarkers, such as amyloid-beta plaques in the brain, allowing medical imaging specialists to determine the biomarker load of patients in a noninvasive manner. PET-CT can be used in cases where LP is contraindicated.7,139-141 However, PET-CT exposes people to ionizing radiation and requires specialized equipment and staff.142,143

Amyloid PET imaging is not part of the routine AD diagnosis pathway in Canada and is not recommended for use in those who show no clinical symptoms. Amyloid PET imaging is primarily used in an AD research setting, although it can be used clinically under special authorization, and is usually ordered by a dementia expert, as indicated by the CCCDTD.17 PET-CT does not currently allow for concomitant tracking of multiple biomarkers, unlike CSF analysis.118

Implementing amyloid PET imaging presents several challenges. These include:

Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities, MRI, and APOE Genotyping

In addition to testing for biomarker levels, regulatory authorities and appropriate-use guidelines also require prospective patients to undergo an MRI examination and APOE genotyping for their susceptibility to amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), an adverse event related to anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs.28,114

In countries that have already approved anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, regulatory authorities require an MRI scan within the 12 months before treatment initiation. This precaution ensures potential patients can begin treatment safely.28,29 This scan identifies patients with microhemorrhages in the brain, which puts them at higher risk of ARIA.114,151 ARIA can be categorized as 2 different subtypes, which can co-occur: ARIA-E (presenting as edema and effusion) or ARIA-H (presenting as microhemorrhages). An MRI exam and reporting of the intensity of symptoms is used to grade the severity of ARIA.152

If an MRI examination was conducted within the 12-month period to assess early-stage AD symptoms and included sequences to evaluate the risk of ARIA, a second MRI scan may not be necessary as a baseline before initiating treatment with anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs. This is because the initial MRI would have already captured the necessary imaging sequences to determine ARIA risk. However, if a CT exam was used to confirm diagnosis of AD, an MRI would still be required because the CT scan would not have sufficient resolution to identify ARIA.114

Implementing MRI may present several challenges, and these include the following:

Along with the MRI examination before treatment initiation, regulatory authorities and appropriate-use guidelines have recommended that patients undergo genetic testing to determine whether they are carriers of APOE4 alleles.28,114 It has been found that people carrying APOE4 alleles are especially at risk for ARIA events. APOE genotyping can allow better-informed discussions of the risk of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs and ensure better patient monitoring.114

Currently, AD genotyping is offered only for patients who have young-onset familial AD; it involves a detailed review of family history by a genetic counsellor or physician and does not include APOE genotyping.158 Genetic testing is conducted at research laboratories in Canada or commercial laboratories in the US.158 While commercial genetic testing is available at clinical laboratories in Canada, it may not be covered by public health plans.158,159 If anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs were approved in Canada, ensuring equitable access to APOE genotyping would be important for ensuring the safety of patients receiving this class of treatment. Such genotyping tests could be undertaken at community laboratories in the future, mitigating the need to travel to hospitals for patients and caregivers.160-162

Figure 3: Mechanisms of Action of Drugs in Phase III Clinical Trials for AD, Classified Using the CADRO Approach

Pie chart showing categories denoting mechanism of action. Phase III trials of drugs for AD in the development pipeline in 2024 were broken down as follows: 34% neurotransmitter receptors; 22% amyloid; 12% synaptic plasticity or neuroprotection; 6% proteostasis or proteinopathies; 6% inflammation; 6% metabolism or bioenergetics; 3% neurogenesis; 3% growth factors and hormones; 3% circadian rhythm; and 3% tau.

Source: Cummings J, Zhou Y, Lee G, Zhong K, Fonseca J, Cheng F. Alzheimer’s disease drug development pipeline: 2024. Alzheimer’s Dement (N Y). 2024;10(2):e12465. Available from: https://www.pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38659717/. Reprinted in accordance with Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0): https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/50.24

Future Biomarker Detection Technologies

As of January 1, 2024, 164 clinical trials evaluating 127 drugs for AD were registered on clinicaltrials.gov, an international voluntary database of clinical research studies from 200 countries, with DMTs constituting 76% of drugs for AD in the database. These drugs are designed to target nearly all disease processes mentioned in the Common Alzheimer’s Disease Research Ontology (CADRO) approach, a method of classifying AD processes into key categories reflecting different aspects of AD pathology and progression.24 Figure 3 illustrates the mechanisms of action of drugs in phase III clinical trials for AD, classified according to the CADRO approach. The increased use of biomarkers, refined target identification, and enhanced methodologies in clinical trials could improve the success rate of AD drug development.24 Ongoing research has identified several promising AD-related biomarkers.

Table 1 presents the emerging fluid biomarkers linked to the drugs in Figure 3, categorized by their clinical development stage: FDA breakthrough-device designation, research-only use, and emerging biomarkers needing further clinical validation. This is not an exhaustive list, as drugs and biomarkers in development are evolving rapidly.

Table 1: Emerging Fluid Biomarkers Linked to the Drugs in Phase III Clinical Trials for AD

CADRO category of drugs in phase III clinical trials24

Fluid biomarkers163

Stage of clinical development

Amyloid

CSF and plasma amyloid-beta

FDA breakthrough-device designation164

Tau

CSF and plasma p-tau

FDA breakthrough-device designation164

Growth factors and hormones

BDNF

Emerging biomarker requiring further clinical validation165

HSD1, trial-specific hormones

Research use only166

Proteostasis or proteinopathies

Proteomics

Research use only166

Inflammation

GFAP

Research use only166,167

YKL-40, sTREM2, MCP-1

Emerging biomarker requiring further clinical validation167-169

Synaptic plasticity or neuroprotection

Neurogranin, synaptotagmin, and SNAP-25

Emerging biomarker requiring further clinical validation163,170

Metabolism or bioenergetics

Metabolomics

Emerging biomarker requiring further clinical validation163,171

Neurotransmitter receptors

None identified

Neurogenesis

None identified

Circadian rhythm

None identified

AD = Alzheimer disease; BDNF = brain-derived neurotrophic factor; CADRO = Common Alzheimer’s Disease Research Ontology; CSF = cerebrospinal fluid; GFAP = glial fibrillary acidic protein; HSD1 = hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1; MCP-1 = monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; p-tau = phosphorylated tau; SNAP-25 = synaptosomal-associated protein 25; sTREM2 = soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2; YKL-40 = chitinase-3-like protein 1.

Blood-Based Biomarkers

Blood-based biomarkers, collected through a blood draw, offer a promising alternative to CSF analysis via LPs or amyloid PET exams, potentially reducing reliance on invasive and resource-intensive methods.172,173 Such biomarkers are intended to complement comprehensive clinical assessments rather than serve as standalone diagnostic tools. While the clinical applications of these biomarkers may introduce some challenges, including scalability, accuracy, robustness, and standardization, they may be less resource-intensive than current options.164,172,174 Notable biomarkers nearing clinical implementation include plasma amyloid-beta42/40 ratio, various tau and phosphorylated tau (p-tau) isoforms, plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP).164,172 There are potential benefits and challenges associated with these biomarkers (Appendix 1).

Composite Panels

Several manufacturers are also exploring the use of panels that combine multiple biomarkers to improve diagnostic accuracy, such as:164,166

Fingerprick Blood Sample and Remote Collection

A fingerprick blood test for measuring NfL, GFAP, p-tau181, and p-tau217 has been developed. In a study involving patients at a memory clinic, both vein and fingerprick blood samples were transferred onto dried blood spot cards and transported without temperature control to a laboratory for interpretation. Upon arrival, biomarkers were successfully detected in both sample types.175 In the vein blood spots, levels of GFAP, NfL, p-tau217, and p-tau181 closely matched those found in standard blood tests. Similarly, the fingerprick blood samples showed results that closely matched standard blood tests for these biomarkers, indicating the potential of fingerprick blood sampling and remote collection as alternatives to traditional blood draws.175 This approach could improve access for patients in remote and underserved communities across Canada, where limited capacity and the absence of standard laboratory facilities make traditional blood draws challenging.

Further Development of Blood-based Biomarkers

Research into plasma protein changes that precede the onset of dementia has identified potential blood-based biomarkers in the immune, lipid, metabolic signalling, and hemostasis pathways. These findings may allow for earlier preclinical AD detection.176,177 RNA sequencing analysis of blood samples has also identified biomarkers for early diagnosis of AD.178

Considerations for Clinical Use

There are some considerations for the clinical use of biomarkers for AD that may support their successful integration into the management of AD. These include the following:

Treatment Administration of Anti–Amyloid-Beta mAb DMTs

The main method of treatment administration for anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs is infusions at regular intervals, ranging from biweekly to monthly.114,180 These infusions can take between 1 and 2 hours to complete. Individuals are often required to remain at the treatment administration centre immediately after the initial infusions to monitor for any adverse reactions.4,114 Over time, infusions could be administered at home if the therapies prove to be sufficiently safe and patients respond without adverse reactions.181 Administration for anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs may also be possible via subcutaneous injections in the future, which could also be administered in the home setting. However, mAbs have limited bioavailability beyond the injection site, and a large volume injection may be difficult to administer.182,183

Infusion Clinics

In Canada, there is increased reliance on private infusion clinics, funded by pharmaceutical companies, to provide early access to new therapies, before public drug plan approval.184-187 Of the outpatient infusion clinics identified in Canada, 573 (52.2%) are owned by private entities and are funded by patient support programs from pharmaceutical companies, or private insurance; or required out-of-pocket patient payments to cover services.187 It is unclear whether these clinics have capacity or are authorized to administer anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, as they are not required to publicly identify their available capacity or the clinical indications and therapies they support.188 A coordinated system for collecting and maintaining information on publicly and privately funded infusion clinics would allow for assessment of the regional availability and capacity to administer anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs.

There may be several considerations for the successful implementation of treatment administration. These include the following:

Future Administration Technologies

New and emerging technologies may play a role in enhancing the operational capacity of infusion clinics, and some of these technologies have already been adopted in other care settings. Integrating smart IV pump technology and remote IV monitoring in infusion clinics, for example, may help to streamline drug-administration processes and workflows and reduce medication errors.

Developments in treatment administration include the following:

Patient Monitoring

When patients begin anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMT, they require monitoring over the course of the treatment, by both caregivers and clinicians, to ensure safe drug administration and to watch for serious adverse effects.4 Monitoring can lead to dose adjustments, temporary pauses, or discontinuation in therapy, and may require regular MRIs and routine cognition tests administered by a health care provider.4

MRI Monitoring

The most common adverse effect of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs is ARIA. Studies have found that most cases of ARIA are transient and asymptomatic, but ARIA can on occasion lead to serious adverse events such as swelling in the brain (ARIA-E) or hemorrhagic brain bleeds (ARIA-H).157,204 If an individual experiences ARIA, treatment is suspended until symptoms resolve or treatment is discontinued permanently.157

In countries that have approved anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, regulatory authorities require patients receiving treatment to undergo routine MRI scans at set infusion intervals to monitor for ARIA.27-30 In addition to these routine scans, if patients exhibit symptoms of ARIA (noticed by the patient, caregivers, or clinicians), a precautionary MRI scan could be clinically indicated based on the severity and intensity of the symptoms, as determined by their care provider. If ARIA is confirmed, repeated scans would be required until the ARIA symptoms have resolved.27-30 Symptoms of ARIA are broad and can include headaches, nausea, dizziness, or increased confusion.205

A recent meta-analysis of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs found that approximately 6.5% to 7.8% of trial patients developed ARIA, although the incidence of ARIA has been found to be as high as 30%, depending on the specific therapy.206 While 80% of these cases are asymptomatic and transient, typically occurring early in treatment with reduced incidence after the first year of treatment, ARIA can still occur at any time, and recurrences are possible.157,206 In rare cases with severe symptoms, hospitalization may be necessary, and there is a risk of death.206

There may be several considerations for the successful implementation of MRI monitoring. These include the following:

Continuation of Treatment

It is unclear how long patients should continue to use anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, as clinical trials have been conducted over a relatively short period. Additionally, clinical trials included patients with early-stage disease, which was assessed by experts using cognitive tests, and it remains unclear what benefits are gained by continued treatment when AD progresses beyond the early stage.21,213 This may necessitate routine check-ins with a care provider to monitor disease progression.21

There are several considerations related to monitoring for disease progression. These include the following:

Future Monitoring Technologies

Advances in MRI technology could ease current capacity constraints in imaging centres and provide a lower-cost and more accessible alternative to conventional MRI. Some current and emerging MRI technologies include the following:

Blood-based biomarkers have also shown promise for monitoring treatment effectiveness, particularly in anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMT trials. The use of biomarkers such as amyloid-beta42/40, p-tau 217, and p-tau181 have been correlated with reductions in use of amyloid PET across various trials, suggesting the potential of these biomarkers for dynamic monitoring and in determining treatment cessation. However, further research is needed to establish the relationship between biomarker changes and clinical outcomes, particularly at the individual level, to support personalized treatment decisions and to better demonstrate treatment effectiveness.219

Estimation of Treatable Population With Incident Early-Stage AD and Medical Imaging Demand

CDA-AMC estimated the size of the treatable population (those eligible for treatment with anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs) with incident cases of early-stage AD in 2020 and the associated demand on medical imaging. In addition, the treatable population and medical imaging demand were projected over a 5-year period from 2020 to 2025. Data availability limited calculations and estimation to this period. Incident cases were used instead of prevalent cases to estimate the number of patients for capacity planning. This approach assumes that prevalent cases of AD would be too advanced to benefit from anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, although this may not accurately reflect all prevalent cases in a real-world setting. The methodology used was adapted from a NICE report that examined potential issues and challenges in evaluating DMTs.21,220

Treatable Population Estimation

A funnel approach was used to estimate a treatable population with incident cases of early-stage AD by narrowing down a starting population of people aged 65 years or older in Canada in stages, as follows (Figure 4):

A literature scan was undertaken to find incidence rates and proportions for each calculation stage. Details on specific methodology and calculations at each stage are provided in Appendix 2.

Figure 4: Funnel Approach for Determining Treatable Population

A funnel diagram shows starting population, of which those with the underlying condition are a subset. The proportion presenting to health care are a subset of those with the condition. Those assessed and diagnosed with early-stage AD form a subset of those presenting to care, and those assessed for eligibility for treatment are a subset of those with an AD diagnosis. The smallest group is those who are eligible for treatment, thus considered “treatable.”

In 2020, the total estimated incident treatable population in Canada was 22,652 people, representing 0.3% of people aged 65 years or older in Canada (6,809,521; Table 2). This number reflects only 1 year of newly diagnosed cases and provides a conservative estimate of the potential treatable population if anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs were available in Canada. It does not account for patients with existing early-stage AD who might also seek treatment, potentially increasing the total treatable population. Additionally, not everyone with sufficient amyloid-beta to qualify for the DMTs may choose to pursue treatment due to comorbidities, frailties, or concerns about potential serious adverse effects, for example.

Table 2: Combined Estimated Incident Treatable Population With Early-Stage AD in Canada for Anti–Amyloid-Beta mAb DMTs in 2020

Stage

Mild cognitive impairment

Mild dementia due to AD

Total incident treatable population

N

% of starting population

N

% of starting population

N

% of starting population

People 65 years or older in Canada

6,809,521

6,809,521

6,809,521

Incidence of underlying condition

347,286

5.1

86,000

1.3

433,286

6.4

Proportion presenting to health care

46,189

0.7

32,938

0.5

79,127

1.2

Assessment and diagnosis of early-stage AD

25,404

0.4

11,621

0.2

37,025

0.5

Treatment eligibility assessment

14,506

0.2

8,146

0.1

22,652

0.3

AD = Alzheimer disease; DMT = disease-modifying therapy; mAb = monoclonal antibody.

A 2023 report examining current health system capacity found that less than 2% of potential patients would be able to access the health care resources required to be treated with anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, with eligibility assessment creating the largest capacity gap to treat patients.5 This further reinforces the need to modify the current patient pathway to treat AD should anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs be approved, as well as to prepare for the adoption of emerging technologies such as blood-based biomarkers.

The estimate used here limited the treatable population to those 65 years of age or older. In clinical trials of DMTs, the average age of trial participants skewed older, exceeding 70 years of age. However, if anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMT were approved in Canada, it is likely that those under the age of 65 with symptoms would also seek assessment and treatment, increasing the treatable population beyond what was estimated. Additionally, this report relies on publicly available information from a literature scan, including studies from a variety of countries, which may affect its accuracy in reflecting the context of Canada. Much of the literature was published before the introduction of DMTs, so the values underpinning the calculation stages may change as new data and studies examining how patient behaviour is affected by DMTs are made available.

Estimation of Medical Imaging Demand

Using the estimated incident treatable population with early-stage AD, the number of PET-CT and MRI exams required for anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs was calculated and matched to the domains of the patient pathway for AD. This is a novel extension to the work done in the NICE report.21,220 Details on specific methodology and assumptions are listed in Appendix 2.

In 2020, an estimated 7,475 PET-CT exams and 70,900 MRI exams would be required to support the 22,652 patients with incident early-stage AD eligible for anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs for 1 year (Table 3). This represents 6% and 3% of the 2019 to 2020 exam volumes for PET-CT and MRI, respectively, adding an additional volume to medical imaging capacity, which would be expected to further contribute to long wait times.144,153 As previously mentioned, eligibility assessment, including PET-CT exams, was 1 of the largest identified capacity gaps in the current health care system, leading to a reduced access to anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs for the treatable population.5

Table 3: Estimated PET-CT and MRI Exams Required Based on Estimated Incident Treatable Population in Canada With Early-Stage AD for Anti–Amyloid-Beta mAb DMTs in 2020

Domain

PET-CT exams

MRI exams

Treatment eligibility assessment

7,475

22,652

Treatment administration of anti-amyloid-beta mAb DMTs

NA

NA

Patient monitoring

NA

48,248

Total

7,475

70,900

AD = Alzheimer disease; DMT = disease-modifying therapy; mAb = monoclonal antibody; NA = not available.

These exam volumes also represent a conservative estimate of potential exams, as it was assumed only patients contraindicated for LPs (33%) would receive PET-CT exams, whereas patient preference may lead to more PET-CT exams than projected.221 In addition, it may be necessary to conduct recurrent PET-CT exams each year to confirm continued eligibility for anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs. The estimated MRI exam volumes include a baseline exam and 2 scheduled monitoring exams for all patients and the associated exams needed for the 6.5% of patients who experience ARIA. However, the estimated MRI exam volumes did not take into account the need for precautionary MRI exams when symptoms of adverse events appear that do not progress to full cases of ARIA, which could significantly inflate the exam volume. Additionally, if people with existing early-stage AD were to seek treatment, the subsequent exam volume would increase as well.

Estimating Future Demand

The 5 years from 2020 to 2025 were examined by combining the estimation of the treatable incident population with the estimated medical imaging demand to aid in potential capacity planning. Details on specific methodology and assumptions are provided in Appendix 2.

Over the 5-year period, an initial jump in the number of patients, from 22,625 patients to 71, 249, was seen in the first 3 years as anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs were introduced. The health system may not be able to handle a large influx of patients and medical imaging exams within a relatively short period of time. With patients remaining on treatment for 2 years before being taken off, a steadier increase of patients was projected, increasing by approximately 4,000 annually.

Table 4: Estimated Incident Treatable Population With Early-Stage AD in Canada for Anti–Amyloid-Beta mAb DMTs From 2020 to 2025 and Estimated Demand on Medical Imaging

Year

Total annual number of patients eligible for treatment

Annual number of incident cases

Annual PET-CT exams

Annual MRI exams

2020

22,625

22,625

7,475

70,900

2021

46,357

23,732

15,307

75,752

2022

71,249

24,892

23,521

79,456

2023

74,733

26,109

24,662

83,339

2024

78,387

27,386

25,868

87,415

2025

82,220

28,725

27,133

91,689

AD = Alzheimer disease; DMT = disease-modifying therapy; mAb = monoclonal antibody.

This projection assumes a constant demand for anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, which may not reflect reality, as demand could grow as the treatment becomes more established. In addition, the projection assumes the treatment period lasts 2 years based on clinical trial parameters, but it remains unclear how long patients would remain on anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, as open-label extension studies are ongoing.222,223 Additionally, a constant increase in the incidence rate was assumed over the 5-year period, which may not reflect the potential future demand, as more patients with symptoms may seek assessment if anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs become more established as a treatment option. Finally, health care providers may be cautious concerning adverse events and limit patient eligibility, or the health system may limit where treatments will be offered during the early phases of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs implementation, lowering the number of patients who will be treated. For instance, 6 months after regulatory approval, it has been reported that only 2,000 to 3,000 people in the US have received treatment with anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMT because treatment was mainly being provided at large neurology centres.224

Future Considerations for Anti–Amyloid-Beta mAb DMTs

With numerous potential treatments for AD in development, the current care pathway may not provide the range of health care resources required for optimal patient support. If these therapies are approved, substantial changes to existing patient care pathways may be necessary to ensure equitable access to them. This may include:

The landscape of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs implementation is already evolving, with the development of blood-based AD biomarker testing. As well, the adoption of portable or remote operating MRI units may play a role in alleviating some equity and travel concerns for patients living in rural or remote areas in the future. These developments may greatly increase access to anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, and care needs to be taken to ensure that these advances can be deployed in a timely and equitable manner. This includes:

Limitations

The aim of this report is to provide a high-level overview of considerations for health care systems in relation to the potential market entry of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs. Some of the challenges may differ in magnitude across different provinces and territories. Additionally, this report specifically focused on anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, as they are the most developed treatment option, they have been approved in some countries, and they share many considerations for potential effects on the treatment pathway and the health care system. Other DMTs for AD that target alternative pathologic processes or use different administration methods (e.g., oral intake) are still in earlier stages of development and may involve additional considerations not covered here. However, these other DMTs for AD may have considerations that overlap with some of the proposed changes to the current treatment pathway for potential uptake of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs.

This report is also limited by information that is publicly accessible via a literature search. Access to provincial and territorial health systems data could provide key information about demographic aspects and the clinical profile of people with early-stage AD, current processes of care, and outcomes of the disease, which would assist in projections and planning to optimize care.

Conclusions

CDA-AMC has highlighted some key considerations in relation to the readiness of health care systems if emerging DMTs were adopted in Canada.

The regulatory approval and public reimbursement of DMTs for AD in Canada would require a new pathway of care to ensure equitable and timely access to these novel therapies.

Implementing the changes to the clinical pathway for the use of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs will require considerations for adaptations across the continuum of care, including health and social human resources planning and additional clinical training, increased capacity for diagnostic imaging, laboratory networks, and IV infusion. Careful consideration of processes and systems would be needed to promote best clinical practice and appropriate use of finite health care resources.

Across different provincial and territorial health care systems, challenges will vary, necessitating open communication and multidisciplinary collaboration between health system partners to facilitate the optimal delivery of patient care. It would take time to design, plan, and operationalize models of care for novel DMTs, and careful consideration would need to be given to emerging technologies that may support their delivery. New blood-based biomarkers, for example, could largely obviate the need for LP via CSF and PET-CT to assess amyloid positivity. An ongoing awareness of emerging health technologies in relation to screening, diagnosis, treatment, monitoring, and assessment of their benefits and limitations would be important to support optimal care and health system sustainability.

This report highlights that certain groups of people in Canada may face challenges in accessing the technologies, services, and clinicians needed to diagnose the presence and severity of the disease, determine eligibility for treatment, administer therapies, and provide ongoing monitoring. Rural and remote populations, newcomers to Canada, Indigenous Peoples, and other groups may experience barriers in accessing and navigating the health care systems, challenging the principle of health equity.

Pan-Canadian alignment among the provinces and territories, as well as input from patients and caregivers, is required to promote a standardized, patient-centred approach to screening, diagnosing, treating, and monitoring patients. Such an approach may help achieve long-term success in expanding capacity and ensuring the delivery of optimal and sustainable care.

References

1.Navigating the path forward for dementia in Canada: the Landmark study: Report 1. Toronto (ON): Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2022: https://alzheimer.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Landmark-Study-Report-1-Path_Alzheimer-Society-Canada_0.pdf. Accessed 2024 Apr 25.

2.Petersen RC, Lopez O, Armstrong MJ, et al. Practice guideline update summary: Mild cognitive impairment: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2018;90(3):126-135. PubMed

3.The Many Faces of Dementia in Canada: the Landmark Study: Report 2. Toronto (ON): Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2024: https://alzheimer.ca/sites/default/files/documents/ASC_The%20Many%20Faces%20of%20Dementia%20In%20Canada_Landmark%20Study_Vol2.pdf. Accessed 2024 Aug 5.

4.Frank A, Ismail Z, Wilson M, et al. Health System Change for Alzheimer's Disease-Modifying Therapies in Canada: Beginning the Discussion. Can J Neurol Sci. 2023:1-9. PubMed

5.Black SE, Budd N, Nygaard HB, et al. A Model Predicting Healthcare Capacity Gaps For Alzheimer's Disease-Modifying Treatment in Canada. Can J Neurol Sci. 2023:1-8. PubMed

6.National Institute on Aging. Alzheimer's Disease Fact Sheet. 2021; https://www.nia.nih.gov/health/alzheimers-and-dementia/alzheimers-disease-fact-sheet. Accessed 2024 Apr 29.

7.Liu J, Hlavka JP, Coulter DT, Baxi SM, Mattke S, Gidengil CA. Assessing the Preparedness of the Canadian Health Care System Infrastructure for an Alzheimer's Treatment. Santa Monica (CA): RAND Corporation; 2017: https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2744.html. Accessed 2024 Apr 29.

8.Duong S, Patel T, Chang F. Dementia: What pharmacists need to know. Can Pharm J (Ott). 2017;150(2):118-129. PubMed

9.Petersen RC, Caracciolo B, Brayne C, Gauthier S, Jelic V, Fratiglioni L. Mild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution. J Intern Med. 2014;275(3):214-228. PubMed

10.Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Warren R, Ali M, Sherifali D, Raina P. Treatment for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ Open. 2015;3(4):E419-E427. https://www.cmajopen.ca/content/3/4/E419. Accessed 2024 Apr 30. PubMed

11.Morris JC, Storandt M, Miller JP, et al. Mild cognitive impairment represents early-stage Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(3):397-405. PubMed

12.Statistics Canada. Table 17-10-0005-01: Population estimates on July 1, by age and gender. 2024; https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000501. Accessed 2024 Apr 29.

13.Dementia in Canada: Economic Burden 2020 to 2050. Toronto (ON): Canadian Centre for Economic Analysis; 2023: https://www.cancea.ca/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/CANCEA-Economic-Impact-of-Dementia-in-Canada-2023-01-08.pdf. Accessed 2024 Oct 31.

14.Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). How dementia impacts Canadians. Dementia in Canada [2018?]; https://www.cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/how-dementia-impacts-canadians. Accessed 2024 May 02.

15.Herrmann N, Tam DY, Balshaw R, et al. The relation between disease severity and cost of caring for patients with Alzheimer disease in Canada. Can J Psychiatry. 2010;55(12):768-775. PubMed

16.Progression - Late Stage. The Progression of Alzheimer's Disease. Toronto (ON): Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2022: https://alzheimer.ca/sites/default/files/documents/Progression-Late-Stage-Alzheimer-Society.pdf. Accessed 2024 Apr 30.

17.Ismail Z, Black SE, Camicioli R, et al. Recommendations of the 5th Canadian Consensus Conference on the diagnosis and treatment of dementia. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(8):1182-1195. PubMed

18.Bergman H, Borson S, Jessen F, et al. Dementia and comorbidities in primary care: a scoping review. BMC Prim Care. 2023;24(1):277. PubMed

19.Gauthier S, Patterson C, Chertkow H, et al. Recommendations of the 4th Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia (CCCDTD4). Can Geriatr J. 2012;15(4):120-126. PubMed

20.Watt JA, Isaranuwatchai W, Grossman L, Straus SE. Disease-modifying drugs for Alzheimer disease: implications for people in Canada. CMAJ. 2023;195(42):E1446-E1448. https://www.cmaj.ca/content/cmaj/195/42/E1446.full.pdf. Accessed 2024 Apr 30. PubMed

21.Potential issues and challenges in evaluation of disease-modifying dementia treatments. HTA Innovation Laboratory Report. London (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2023: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/HTA%20Lab/HTA-lab-dmdt.pdf. Accessed 2024 Apr 29.

22.Cummings J, Fox N. Defining Disease Modifying Therapy for Alzheimer's Disease. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2017;4(2):109-115. PubMed

23.Selkoe DJ, Hardy J. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer's disease at 25 years. EMBO Mol Med. 2016;8(6):595-608. PubMed

24.Cummings J, Zhou Y, Lee G, Zhong K, Fonseca J, Cheng F. Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2024. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2024;10(2):e12465. PubMed

25.Cummings J, Ritter A, Zhong K. Clinical Trials for Disease-Modifying Therapies in Alzheimer's Disease: A Primer, Lessons Learned, and a Blueprint for the Future. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S3-S22. PubMed

26.Cummings J, Zhou Y, Lee G, Zhong K, Fonseca J, Cheng F. Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2023. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2023;9(2):e12385. PubMed

27.Biogen Inc. Prescribing information: Aduhelm (aducanumab-avwa) injection, for intravenous use. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2021: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2021/761178s003lbl.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 23.

28.Eisai Inc. Prescribing information: Leqembi (lecanemab-irmb) injection, for intravenous use. Silver Springs (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2023: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/761269s000lbl.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 23.

29.Report on the Deliberation Results: Leqembi for Intravenous Infusion 200 mg. Tokyo (JP): Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Pharmaceutical Evaluation Division, Pharmaceutical Safety and Environmental Health Bureau; 2023: https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000267068.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 23.

30.Eli Lilly and Company. Prescribing information: Kisunla (donanemab-azbt) injection, for intravenous use. Silver Spring (MD): U.S. Food and Drug Administration; 2024: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2024/761248s000lbl.pdf. Accessed 2024 Aug 19.

31.Sturchio A, Dwivedi AK, Young CB, et al. High cerebrospinal amyloid-β 42 is associated with normal cognition in individuals with brain amyloidosis. eClinicalMedicine. 2021;38. PubMed

32.Morris GP, Clark IA, Vissel B. Questions concerning the role of amyloid-beta in the definition, aetiology and diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2018;136(5):663-689. PubMed

33.Brucki SMD, Cesar-Freitas KG, Spera RR, Borges CR, Smid J. Are we ready to use anti-amyloid therapy in Alzheimer's disease? Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2022;80(5 Suppl 1):15-23. PubMed

34.Lang L, Clifford A, Wei L, et al. Prevalence and determinants of undetected dementia in the community: a systematic literature review and a meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e011146. PubMed

35.Sternberg SA, Wolfson C, Baumgarten M. Undetected dementia in community-dwelling older people: the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000;48(11):1430-1434. PubMed

36.Öhman F, Hassenstab J, Berron D, Schöll M, Papp KV. Current advances in digital cognitive assessment for preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021;13(1):e12217. PubMed

37.Chun CT, Seward K, Patterson A, Melton A, MacDonald-Wicks L. Evaluation of Available Cognitive Tools Used to Measure Mild Cognitive Decline: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2021;13(11). PubMed

38.Cahill S, Pierce M, Werner P, Darley A, Bobersky A. A systematic review of the public's knowledge and understanding of Alzheimer's disease and dementia. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2015;29(3):255-275. PubMed

39.Laurell AAS, Venkataraman AV, Schmidt T, et al. Estimating demand for potential disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer's disease in the UK. Br J Psychiatry. 2024;224(6):198-204. PubMed

40.World Alzheimer Report 2024: Global changes in attitudes to dementia. London (UK): Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2024: https://www.alzint.org/u/World-Alzheimer-Report-2024.pdf. Accessed 2024 Oct 31.

41.Aminzadeh F, Molnar FJ, Dalziel WB, Ayotte D. A review of barriers and enablers to diagnosis and management of persons with dementia in primary care. Can Geriatr J. 2012;15(3):85-94. PubMed

42.CADTH Horizon Scan: Dementia Concerns and Considerations: A CADTH Panel of People with Lived Experience. Can J Health Technol. 2022;2(4). https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/hta-he/HC0022-Dementia-Panel.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 02.

43.Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Unpaid caregiver challenges and supports. Dementia in Canada 2018; https://www.cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/unpaid-caregiver-challenges-and-supports. Accessed 2024 Oct 28.

44.Black SE, Gauthier S, Dalziel W, et al. Canadian Alzheimer's disease caregiver survey: baby-boomer caregivers and burden of care. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2010;25(8):807-813. PubMed

45.The Canadian Press. Canadians dismiss early signs of dementia. CBC. 2012 Jan 4. https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/canadians-dismiss-early-signs-of-dementia-1.1187103. Accessed 2024 May 02.

46.Foin G. Expérience des personnes qui vivent avec un trouble neurocognitif au Québec [Experience of people who live with a neurocognitive disorder in Quebec]. Quebec (QC): Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS); 2024: https://www.inesss.qc.ca/fileadmin/doc/INESSS/Rapports/Usage_optimal/INESSS_Alzheimer_TNC_EC_VF.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 02.

47.2017 Awareness Survey Executive Summary. Toronto (ON): Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2017: https://ilivewithdementia.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2017_AWARENESS-SURVEY_EXECUTIVE_SUMMARY.pdf. Accessed 2024 Oct 31.

48.Duong D, Vogel L. National survey highlights worsening primary care access. CMAJ. 2023;195(16):E592-E593. PubMed

49.Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Better access to primary care key to improving health of Canadians. Taking the pulse: Measuring shared priorities for Canadian health care, 2024 2024; https://www.cihi.ca/en/taking-the-pulse-measuring-shared-priorities-for-canadian-health-care-2024/better-access-to-primary-care-key-to-improving-health-of-canadians. Accessed 2024 Nov 7.

50.Pimlott NJ, Persaud M, Drummond N, et al. Family physicians and dementia in Canada: Part 2. Understanding the challenges of dementia care. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55(5):508-509 e501-507.

51.Risdon C. Analysis: The impact of not having a family doctor: Patients are worse off, and so is the health system. McMaster University Brighter World 2023 Oct 19; https://brighterworld.mcmaster.ca/articles/analysis-the-impact-of-not-having-a-family-doctor-patients-are-worse-off-and-so-is-the-health-system/. Accessed 2024 May 02.

52.Bacsu J, Novik N, Johnson S, et al. Addressing the needs of rural and remote people in a national dementia strategy for Canada. Can J Public Health. 2019;110(6):752-755. PubMed

53.Wilson CR, Rourke J, Oandasan IF, Bosco C. Progress made on access to rural health care in Canada. Can Fam Physician. 2020;66(1):31-36.

54.Roberts JR, Windle G, Story A, et al. Dementia in rural settings: a scoping review exploring the personal experiences of people with dementia and their carers. Ageing and Society. 2023:1-30.

55.Access to health services as a social determinant of First Nations, Inuit and Métis health. Prince George (BC): National Collaborating Centre for Indigenous Health; 2019: https://www.nccih.ca/docs/determinants/FS-AccessHealthServicesSDOH-2019-EN.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 28.

56.Yangzom K, Masoud H, Hahmann T. Primary health care access among First Nations people living off reserve, Métis and Inuit, 2017 to 2020. Ottawa (ON): Statistics Canada, Centre for Indigenous Statistics and Partnerships; 2023: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/41-20-0002/412000022023005-eng.htm. Accessed 2024 May 28.

57.Anthonisen G, Luke A, MacNeill L, MacNeill AL, Goudreau A, Doucet S. Patient navigation programs for people with dementia, their caregivers, and members of the care team: a scoping review. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(2):281-325. PubMed

58.Tang KL, Kelly J, Sharma N, Ghali WA. Patient navigation programs in Alberta, Canada: an environmental scan. CMAJ Open. 2021;9(3):E841-E847. PubMed

59.Hinton L, Tran D, Peak K, Meyer OL, Quinones AR. Mapping racial and ethnic healthcare disparities for persons living with dementia: A scoping review. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(4):3000-3020. PubMed

60.Gauthier S, Rosa-Neto P, Morais JA, Webster C. World Alzheimer Report 2021: Journey through the diagnosis of dementia. London (UK): Alzheimer's Disease International; 2021: https://www.alzint.org/u/World-Alzheimer-Report-2021.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 01.

61.Miedema B, Hamilton R, Easley J. Climbing the walls: Structural barriers to accessing primary care for refugee newcomers in Canada. Can Fam Physician. 2008;54(3):335-336, 338-339. PubMed

62.Ravichandiran N, Mathews M, Ryan BL. Utilization of healthcare by immigrants in Canada: a cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Community Health Survey. BMC Prim Care. 2022;23(1):69. PubMed

63.Mayeda ER, Glymour MM, Quesenberry CP, Whitmer RA. Inequalities in dementia incidence between six racial and ethnic groups over 14 years. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(3):216-224. PubMed

64.Pimlott NJ, Persaud M, Drummond N, et al. Family physicians and dementia in Canada: Part 1. Clinical practice guidelines: awareness, attitudes, and opinions. Can Fam Physician. 2009;55(5):506-507 e501-505.

65.Bradford A, Kunik ME, Schulz P, Williams SP, Singh H. Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2009;23(4):306-314. PubMed

66.Liss JL, Seleri Assuncao S, Cummings J, et al. Practical recommendations for timely, accurate diagnosis of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease (MCI and dementia) in primary care: a review and synthesis. J Intern Med. 2021;290(2):310-334. PubMed

67.Bacsu J, Mateen FJ, Johnson S, Viger MD, Hackett P. Improving Dementia Care Among Family Physicians: From Stigma to Evidence-Informed Knowledge. Can Geriatr J. 2020;23(4):340-343. PubMed

68.Kokorelias KM, Markoulakis R, Hitzig SL. Considering a Need for Dementia-Specific, Family-Centered Patient Navigation in Canada. J Appl Gerontol. 2023;42(1):19-27. PubMed

69.Boise L, Morgan DL, Kaye J, Camicioli R. Delays in the diagnosis of dementia: Perspectives of family caregivers. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease. 1999;14(1):20-26.

70.Walker JD, O'Connell ME, Pitawanakwat K, et al. Canadian Indigenous Cognitive Assessment (CICA): Inter-rater reliability and criterion validity in Anishinaabe communities on Manitoulin Island, Canada. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021;13(1):e12213. PubMed

71.How Canada Compares: Results From the Commonwealth Fund's 2019 International Health Policy Survey of Primary Care Physicians - Accessible Report. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI); 2020: https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/cmwf-2019-accessible-report-en-web.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jun 10.

72.Ng KP, Chiew HJ, Lim L, Rosa-Neto P, Kandiah N, Gauthier S. The influence of language and culture on cognitive assessment tools in the diagnosis of early cognitive impairment and dementia. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018;18(11):859-869. PubMed

73.Chithiramohan T, Santhosh S, Threlfall G, et al. Culture-Fair Cognitive Screening Tools for Assessment of Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2024;8(1):289-306. PubMed

74.O'Driscoll C, Shaikh M. Cross-Cultural Applicability of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A Systematic Review. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(3):789-801. PubMed

75.Halseth R. Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias in Indigenous Populations: Knowledge, Needs, and Gaps. Chronic and Infectious Diseases. Prince George (BC): National Collaborating Centre for Indigenous Health; 2022: https://www.nccih.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/10385/Alzheimers-Disease-and-Related%20Dementias-in-Indigenous-Populations_Web_2022-08-11.pdf. Accessed 2024 Oct 28.

76.McCleary L, Persaud M, Hum S, et al. Pathways to dementia diagnosis among South Asian Canadians. Dementia (London). 2013;12(6):769-789. PubMed

77.Iroanyah N, Savundranayagam MY, Mundadan RG, Sivananthan S. Equity, diversity, and inclusion in dementia diagnosis: a Canadian perspective. World Alzheimer Report 2021: Journey through the diagnosis of dementia London (UK): Alzheimer's Disease International; 2021: https://www.alzint.org/u/World-Alzheimer-Report-2021.pdf. Accessed 2024 Oct 28.

78.Jacklin K, Pitawanakwat K, Blind M, et al. Developing the Canadian Indigenous Cognitive Assessment for Use With Indigenous Older Anishinaabe Adults in Ontario, Canada. Innov Aging. 2020;4(4):igaa038. PubMed

79.Gove D, Nielsen TR, Smits C, et al. The challenges of achieving timely diagnosis and culturally appropriate care of people with dementia from minority ethnic groups in Europe. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;36(12):1823-1828. PubMed

80.Constantinescu A, Li H, Yu J, Hoggard C, Holroyd-Leduc J. Exploring Rural Family Physicians' Challenges in Providing Dementia Care: A Qualitative Study. Can J Aging. 2018;37(4):390-399. PubMed

81.Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Family doctor preparedness. Dementia in Canada [2018?]; https://www.cihi.ca/en/dementia-in-canada/spotlight-on-dementia-issues/family-doctor-preparedness. Accessed 2024 May 02.

82.Kornelsen J, Khowaja AR, Av-Gay G, et al. The rural tax: comprehensive out-of-pocket costs associated with patient travel in British Columbia. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):854. PubMed

83.Mathews M, West R, Buehler S. How important are out-of-pocket costs to rural patients' cancer care decisions? Can J Rural Med. 2009;14(2):54-60. PubMed

84.Lee L, Molnar F, Hillier LM, Patel T, Slonim K. Multispecialty Interprofessional Team Memory Clinics: Enhancing Collaborative Practice and Health Care Providers' Experience of Dementia Care. Can J Aging. 2022;41(1):96-109. PubMed

85.Elbeddini A, Tayefehchamani Y, Yilmaz Z, Villegas JJ, Zhang EY. Evaluation of a community-based memory clinic in collaboration with local hospitals to support patients with memory decline. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2022;17(2):220-234. PubMed

86.ARTIC. Memory Clinics expanded to underserviced areas in Ontario. New ARTIC project helps patients living with dementia receive care, closer to home. Toronto (ON): Health Quality Ontario; 2017 Jan 23: https://www.hqontario.ca/portals/0/Documents/qi/artic/artic-pcmc-media-release-2016-en.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 29.

87.Morgan DG, Crossley M, Kirk A, et al. Improving access to dementia care: development and evaluation of a rural and remote memory clinic. Aging Ment Health. 2009;13(1):17-30. PubMed

88.CADTH Horizon Scan: Understanding the Portrait of Dementia Care in Canada: A CADTH Panel of Experts. Can J Health Technol. 2022;2(8). https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/hs-eh/EH0110-Dementia-Clinician-Panel-v2.0-Final.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 02.

89.Kirby S, Weston LE, Barton JJ, Buske L, Chauhan TS. Report of the Canadian Neurological Society Manpower Survey 2012. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016;43(2):227-237. PubMed

90.Glauser W. Lack of interest in geriatrics among medical trainees a concern as population ages. CMAJ. 2019;191(20):E570-E571. PubMed

91.Basu M, Cooper T, Kay K, et al. Updated Inventory and Projected Requirements for Specialist Physicians in Geriatrics. Can Geriatr J. 2021;24(3):200-208. PubMed

92.Vedel I, Sourial N, Arsenault-Lapierre G, Godard-Sebillotte C, Bergman H. Impact of the Quebec Alzheimer Plan on the detection and management of Alzheimer disease and other neurocognitive disorders in primary health care: a retrospective study. CMAJ Open. 2019;7(2):E391-E398. PubMed

93.Lee L, Hillier LM, Harvey D. Integrating community services into primary care: improving the quality of dementia care. Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2014;4(1):11-21. PubMed

94.Lee L, Hillier LM, Heckman G, et al. Primary Care-Based Memory Clinics: Expanding Capacity for Dementia Care. Can J Aging. 2014;33(3):307-319. PubMed

95.CADTH Health Technology Review: Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory 2022-2023: Provincial and Territorial Overview. Can J Health Technol. 2024;4(8):1-81. https://www.cda-amc.ca/sites/default/files/hta-he/HC0024_Overview.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 1.

96.Moir M, Barua B, Wannamaker H. Waiting your turn: Wait times for health care in Canada, 2023 Report. Vancouver (BC): Fraser Institute; 2023: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/studies/waiting-your-turn-wait-times-for-health-care-in-canada-2023. Accessed 2024 May 13.

97.Addressing the Medical Imaging Dilemma in Canada: Restoring Timely Access for Patients Post-Pandemic. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Association of Radiologists; 2022: https://car.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/CAR-PreBudgetSubmission-2022-e-web-FINAL_edited_Feb.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 2.

98.Staffaroni AM, Tsoy E, Taylor J, Boxer AL, Possin KL. Digital Cognitive Assessments for Dementia: Digital assessments may enhance the efficiency of evaluations in neurology and other clinics. Pract Neurol (Fort Wash Pa). 2020;2020:24-45. PubMed

99.Jannati A, Toro-Serey C, Gomes-Osman J, et al. Digital Clock and Recall is superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination for the detection of mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024;16(1):2. PubMed

100.Britton GB, Huang LK, Villarreal AE, et al. Digital phenotyping: An equal opportunity approach to reducing disparities in Alzheimer's disease and related dementia research. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2023;15(4):e12495. PubMed

101.Chaitanuwong P, Singhanetr P, Chainakul M, Arjkongharn N, Ruamviboonsuk P, Grzybowski A. Potential Ocular Biomarkers for Early Detection of Alzheimer's Disease and Their Roles in Artificial Intelligence Studies. Neurol Ther. 2023;12(5):1517-1532. PubMed

102.Wisely CE, Richardson A, Henao R, et al. A Convolutional Neural Network Using Multimodal Retinal Imaging for Differentiation of Mild Cognitive Impairment from Normal Cognition. Ophthalmol Sci. 2024;4(1):100355. PubMed

103.Biospace. Health Canada grants approval of the Eye-Tracking Neurological Assessment for Multiple Sclerosis (ETNA-MS) for use in tracking disease progression in people living with MS. 2024 Mar 25; https://www.biospace.com/article/releases/health-canada-grants-approval-of-the-eye-tracking-neurological-assessment-for-multiple-sclerosis-etna-and-8482-ms-for-use-in-tracking-disease-progression-in-people-living-with-ms/. Accessed 2024 May 6.

104.Innodem Neurosciences. Development and Validation of a Novel Functional Eye-Tracking Software Application for Alzheimer's Disease. 2024; https://innodemneurosciences.com/blogs/clinical-trials/development-and-validation-of-a-novel-functional-eye-tracking-software-application-for-alzheimers-disease. Accessed 2024 May 6.

105.García-Bermúdez MY, Vohra R, Freude K, et al. Potential Retinal Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(21). PubMed

106.Businesswire. AIRAmed Receives FDA 510(k) Clearance for Its AIRAscore Brain Volumetry Software: Novel Technology Aids Physicians in Early Detection of Alzheimer’s and Other Dementias. 2023 Sep 19; https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20230919787530/en/AIRAmed-Receives-FDA-510-k-Clearance-for-Its-AIRAscore-Brain-Volumetry-Software. Accessed 2024 May 6.

107.Yuan C, Linn KA, Hubbard RA. Algorithmic Fairness of Machine Learning Models for Alzheimer Disease Progression. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(11):e2342203. PubMed

108.Yin C, Imms P, Cheng M, et al. Anatomically interpretable deep learning of brain age captures domain-specific cognitive impairment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023;120(2):e2214634120. PubMed

109.PR Newswire. Darmiyan Receives FDA Approval for BrainSee, the First Prognostic Test for Predicting Likelihood of Progression to Alzheimer's Dementia. 2024; https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/darmiyan-receives-fda-approval-for-brainsee-the-first-prognostic-test-for-predicting-likelihood-of-progression-to-alzheimers-dementia-302033616.html. Accessed 2024 May 6.

110.Zou H, Xiao L, Zeng D, Luo S. Multivariate functional mixed model with MRI data: An application to Alzheimer's disease. Stat Med. 2023;42(10):1492-1511. PubMed

111.Bucholc M, James C, Khleifat AA, et al. Artificial intelligence for dementia research methods optimization. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(12):5934-5951. PubMed

112.Papaliagkas V, Kalinderi K, Vareltzis P, Moraitou D, Papamitsou T, Chatzidimitriou M. CSF Biomarkers in the Early Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's Disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):8976. PubMed

113.Kim JP, Kim J, Jang H, et al. Predicting amyloid positivity in patients with mild cognitive impairment using a radiomics approach. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6954. PubMed

114.Cummings J, Apostolova L, Rabinovici GD, et al. Lecanemab: Appropriate Use Recommendations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2023;10(3):362-377. PubMed

115.Schiffman C, Bittner T, Giacobino C, et al. Determining the amyloid PET and CSF inclusion criteria for the SKYLINE secondary prevention study with gantenerumab. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(S6):e062376.

116.Lee SA, Sposato LA, Hachinski V, Cipriano LE. Cost-effectiveness of cerebrospinal biomarkers for the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2017;9(1):18. PubMed

117.Hampel H, Shaw LM, Aisen P, et al. State-of-the-art of lumbar puncture and its place in the journey of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(1):159-177. PubMed

118.Stiffel M, Bergeron D, Mourabit Amari K, et al. Use of Alzheimer's Disease Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in A Tertiary Care Memory Clinic. Can J Neurol Sci. 2022;49(2):203-209. PubMed

119.Wetmore SJ, Rivet C, Tepper J, Tatemichi S, Donoff M, Rainsberry P. Definining core procedure skills for Canadian family medicine training. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51(10):1365. PubMed

120.Yeo CT, Davison C, Ungi T, Holden M, Fichtinger G, McGraw R. Examination of Learning Trajectories for Simulated Lumbar Puncture Training Using Hand Motion Analysis. Acad Emerg Med. 2015;22(10):1187-1195. PubMed

121.Gouvernement du Québec. Services offered by specialized nurse practitioners. 2024; https://www.quebec.ca/en/health/health-system-and-services/service-organization/specialized-nurse-practitioners/services-offered-specialized-nurse-practitioners. Accessed 2024 May 30.

122.Sweeney M, Al-Diwani A, Hadden R. Improving the safety and efficiency of outpatient lumbar puncture service. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2016;5(1). PubMed

123.Duits FH, Martinez-Lage P, Paquet C, et al. Performance and complications of lumbar puncture in memory clinics: Results of the multicenter lumbar puncture feasibility study. Alzheimers Dement. 2016;12(2):154-163. PubMed

124.Mayo Clinic. Lumbar puncture (spinal tap). 2024; https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/lumbar-puncture/about/pac-20394631. Accessed 2024 Jun 18.

125.Bonomi S, Gupta MR, Schindler SE. Inadequate reimbursement for lumbar puncture is a potential barrier to accessing new Alzheimer's disease treatments. Alzheimers Dement. 2023;19(12):5849-5851. PubMed

126.Bouwman FH, Frisoni GB, Johnson SC, et al. Clinical application of CSF biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: From rationale to ratios. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2022;14(1):e12314. PubMed

127.Menendez-Gonzalez M. Routine lumbar puncture for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Is it safe? Front Aging Neurosci. 2014;6:65. PubMed

128.Moulder KL, Besser LM, Beekly D, Blennow K, Kukull W, Morris JC. Factors Influencing Successful Lumbar Puncture in Alzheimer Research. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2017;31(4):287-294. PubMed

129.Vitali P. How to reassure people in need of a lumbar puncture. World Alzheimer Report 2021. Chapter 11 Spinal fluid. London (UK): Alzheimer's Disease International; 2021: https://www.alzint.org/u/World-Alzheimer-Report-2021-Chapter-11.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 8.

130.Babapour Mofrad R, Fruijtier AD, Visser LNC, et al. Lumbar puncture patient video increases knowledge and reduces uncertainty: An RCT. Alzheimers Dement (N Y). 2021;7(1):e12127. PubMed

131.Providence Health Care. Neurodegenerative Profile, CSF. [date unknown]; https://www.providencelaboratory.org/test-catalog/628. Accessed 2024 May 10.

132.Western University Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Pathology and Labratory Medicine. Under the Microscope: PaLM Quarterly Newsletter Issue No. 4. London (ON): Pathology and Labratory Medicine; 2023: https://www.schulich.uwo.ca/pathol/about_us/utm_newsletter/Under%20the%20Microscope%20December%202023.pdf. Accessed 2024 Oct 28.

133.BC Neuroimmunology Laboratory Inc. Test Directory. Vancouver (BC): BC Neuroimmunology; 2024: https://bcneuro.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/BCNI-Test-Directory_Rev2.1.pdf. Accessed 2024 Oct 28.

134.Hansson O, Batrla R, Brix B, et al. The Alzheimer's Association international guidelines for handling of cerebrospinal fluid for routine clinical measurements of amyloid beta and tau. Alzheimers Dement. 2021;17(9):1575-1582. PubMed

135.Ferrer R, Zhu N, Arranz J, et al. Importance of cerebrospinal fluid storage conditions for the Alzheimer's disease diagnostics on an automated platform. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022;60(7):1058-1063. PubMed

136.Teitlebaum C, Collins A. Canadian Privacy Legislation and the Cross-Border Transfer of Personal Information Part One: Personal Health Information. Toronto (ON): Aird & Berlis LLP; [2008]: https://www.airdberlis.com/docs/default-source/articles/article—cross-border-transfer-of-personal-health-information.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed 2024 May 30.

137.Willemse EAJ, Tijms BM, van Berckel BNM, et al. Comparing CSF amyloid-beta biomarker ratios for two automated immunoassays, Elecsys and Lumipulse, with amyloid PET status. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021;13(1):e12182. PubMed

138.Help for Today, Hope for Tomorrow: Pre-Budget Submission 2024. Toronto (ON): Alzheimer Society of Ontario; 2024: https://alzheimer.ca/on/sites/on/files/documents/2024%20Budget%20Submission_EN.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 14.

139.Filippi L, Chiaravalloti A, Bagni O, Schillaci O. 18F-labeled radiopharmaceuticals for the molecular neuroimaging of amyloid plaques in Alzheimer's disease. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;8(4):268-281. PubMed

140.Cummings J, Osse AML, Cammann D, Powell J, Chen J. Anti-Amyloid Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Alzheimer's Disease. Biodrugs. 2023. PubMed

141.Garibotto V, Albert NL, Barthel H, et al. The approval of a disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer's disease: impact and consequences for the nuclear medicine community. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021;48(10):3033-3036. PubMed

142.The Implementation Considerations of PET-CT. (Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory Service Report). Ottawa (ON): CDA-AMC; 2022: https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/2022-01/implementation_considerations_of_PET-CT.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 14.

143.Verfaillie G, Franck C, De Crop A, Beels L, D'Asseler Y, Bacher K. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the radiation dose of computed tomography in hybrid nuclear medicine imaging. EJNMMI Phys. 2023;10(1):32. PubMed

144.CADTH Health Technology Review: Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory 2022-2023: PET-CT and PET-MRI. Can J Health Technol. 2024;4(8):1-72. https://www.cda-amc.ca/sites/default/files/hta-he/HC0024-04-CMII4-PET-Hybrid.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 1.

145.The Role of PET-CT in Drugs Targeting Amyloid-Beta in Alzheimer Disease: Part 2. (Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory Service Report). Ottawa (ON): CDA-AMC; 2022: https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/2022-01/role_of_PET-CT_in_drugs_targeting_amyloid_beta_in_alzheimer_disease_part_2FINAL.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 13.

146.Health Canada. Product Information: NeuraCeq (Florbetaben (18F)): 3 µg/mL Solution for Intravenous Administration. 2024; https://health-products.canada.ca/dpd-bdpp/info?lang=eng&code=94968. Accessed 2024 May 14.

147.The future of PET-CT in Canada. (Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory Service Report). Ottawa (ON): CDA-AMC; 2021: https://www.cda-amc.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/2021-10/cmii_service_future_of_PET_CT.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 13.

148.Cao DJ, Hurrell C, Patlas MN. Current Status of Burnout in Canadian Radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2023;74(1):37-43. PubMed

149.CADTH Health Technology Review: Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory 2022–2023: The Medical Imaging Team. Can J Health Technol. 2024;4(8). https://www.cda-amc.ca/sites/default/files/hta-he/HC0024-08-Medical-Imaging-Team.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 1.

150.Gerwing M. New PET scanner sits idle at Winnipeg hospital without staff to operate it. CTV News. 2023 Apr 6. https://winnipeg.ctvnews.ca/new-pet-scanner-sits-idle-at-winnipeg-hospital-without-staff-to-operate-it-1.6346224. Accessed 2024 May 30.

151.Hampel H, Elhage A, Cho M, Apostolova LG, Nicoll JAR, Atri A. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA): radiological, biological and clinical characteristics. Brain. 2023;146(11):4414-4424. PubMed

152.Roytman M, Mashriqi F, Al-Tawil K, et al. Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities: An Update. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2023;220(4):562-574. PubMed

153.CADTH Health Technology Review: Canadian Medical Imaging Inventory 2022–2023: MRI. Can J Health Technol. 2024;4(8). https://www.cda-amc.ca/sites/default/files/hta-he/HC0024-006-CMII4-MRI.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 1.

154.Deoni SCL, Medeiros P, Deoni AT, et al. Development of a mobile low-field MRI scanner. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):5690. PubMed

155.Improving Access to Lifesaving Imaging Care for Canadians. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Association of Radiologists; 2022: https://car.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/CAR_Multistakeholder_Brief_FINAL_2022_Nov.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jul 31.

156.Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI). Unnecessary Care in Canada. Ottawa (ON): CIHI; 2017: https://secure.cihi.ca/free_products/choosing-wisely-baseline-report-en-web.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jun 19.

157.Barakos J, Purcell D, Suhy J, et al. Detection and Management of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease Treated with Anti-Amyloid Beta Therapy. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2022;9(2):211-220. PubMed

158.Understanding Genetics and Alzheimer's Disease. Toronto (ON): Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2018: https://alzheimer.ca/ab/sites/ab/files/documents/research_understanding-genetics-and-alzheimers-disease.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 24.

159.Maruf AA, Fan M, Arnold PD, Muller DJ, Aitchison KJ, Bousman CA. Pharmacogenetic Testing Options Relevant to Psychiatry in Canada: Options de tests pharmacogenetiques pertinents en psychiatrie au Canada. Can J Psychiatry. 2020;65(8):521-530. PubMed

160.Zhong L, Xie YZ, Cao TT, et al. A rapid and cost-effective method for genotyping apolipoprotein E gene polymorphism. Mol Neurodegener. 2016;11(2):2. PubMed

161.LifeLabs Genetics. Did You Know: Dementia and Hereditary Testing. 2019; https://www.lifelabsgenetics.com/2019/01/30/dementia-and-hereditary-testing/. Accessed 2024 Oct 29.

162.Dynacare. APOE-ALZHEIMER'S RISK (National). [date unknown]; https://www.dynacare.ca/specialpages/secondarynav/find-a-test/nat/apoe-alzheimer-s%C2%A0risk.aspx?sr=NAT&st=. Accessed 2024 Oct 29.

163.Cummings J, Kinney J. Biomarkers for Alzheimer's Disease: Context of Use, Qualification, and Roadmap for Clinical Implementation. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(7). PubMed

164.Hampel H, Hu Y, Cummings J, et al. Blood-based biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease: Current state and future use in a transformed global healthcare landscape. Neuron. 2023;111(18):2781-2799. PubMed

165.Gliwińska A, Czubilińska-Łada J, Więckiewicz G, et al. The Role of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) in Diagnosis and Treatment of Epilepsy, Depression, Schizophrenia, Anorexia Nervosa and Alzheimer’s Disease as Highly Drug-Resistant Diseases: A Narrative Review. Brain Sci. 2023;13(2):163. PubMed

166.Pleen J, Camerucci E, Al-Sabbagh M, Cunningham K. Blood-Based Biomarkers in Alzheimer Disease: Clinical Implementation and Limitations. Pract Neurol. 2024;23:27-29,35.

167.Pelkmans W, Shekari M, Brugulat-Serrat A, et al. Astrocyte biomarkers GFAP and YKL-40 mediate early Alzheimer's disease progression. Alzheimers Dement. 2024;20(1):483-493. PubMed

168.Morenas-Rodríguez E, Li Y, Nuscher B, et al. Soluble TREM2 in CSF and its association with other biomarkers and cognition in autosomal-dominant Alzheimer's disease: a longitudinal observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2022;21(4):329-341. PubMed

169.Wang T, Yao Y, Han C, et al. MCP-1 levels in astrocyte-derived exosomes are changed in preclinical stage of Alzheimer's disease. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1119298. PubMed

170.Agnello L, Lo Sasso B, Vidali M, et al. Neurogranin as a Reliable Biomarker for Synaptic Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021;11(12). PubMed

171.Oka T, Matsuzawa Y, Tsuneyoshi M, et al. Multiomics analysis to explore blood metabolite biomarkers in an Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):6797. PubMed

172.Hansson O, Blennow K, Zetterberg H, Dage J. Blood biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease in clinical practice and trials. Nat Aging. 2023;3(5):506-519. PubMed

173.Ashton NJ, Brum WS, Di Molfetta G, et al. Diagnostic Accuracy of a Plasma Phosphorylated Tau 217 Immunoassay for Alzheimer Disease Pathology. JAMA Neurol. 2024;81(3):255-263. PubMed

174.Dark HE, Duggan MR, Walker KA. Plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's and related dementias: A review and outlook for clinical neuropsychology. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024;39(3):313-324. PubMed

175.Alzheimer’s Association Media Line. From the Alzheimer’s Association International Conference 2023: Simple finger prick test exemplifies advances in Alzheimer’s disease blood tests. Chicago (IL): Alzheimer’s Association; 2023: https://aaic.alz.org/downloads2023/Blood-Tests-AAIC-2023.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 15.

176.Tin A, Sullivan KJ, Walker KA, et al. Proteomic Analysis Identifies Circulating Proteins Associated With Plasma Amyloid-β and Incident Dementia. Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2023;3(3):490-499. PubMed

177.Walker KA, Chen J, Zhang J, et al. Large-scale plasma proteomic analysis identifies proteins and pathways associated with dementia risk. Nat Aging. 2021;1(5):473-489. PubMed

178.Shigemizu D, Mori T, Akiyama S, et al. Identification of potential blood biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease through RNA sequencing analysis. Alzheimers Res Ther. 2020;12(1):87. PubMed

179.Zeng X, Chen Y, Sehrawat A, et al. Alzheimer blood biomarkers: practical guidelines for study design, sample collection, processing, biobanking, measurement and result reporting. Mol Neurodegener. 2024;19(1):40. PubMed

180.Cummings J, Aisen P, Apostolova LG, Atri A, Salloway S, Weiner M. Aducanumab: Appropriate Use Recommendations. J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2021;8(4):398-410. PubMed

181.Belder CRS, Schott JM, Fox NC. Preparing for disease-modifying therapies in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet Neurol. 2023;22(9):782-783. PubMed

182.Rosa-Neto P, Gauthier S. World Alzheimer Report 2022: Life after diagnosis: Navigating treatment, care and support. London (UK): Alzheimer's Disease International; 2022: https://www.alzint.org/u/World-Alzheimer-Report-2022.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 21.

183.Varkhede N, Forrest ML. Understanding the Monoclonal Antibody Disposition after Subcutaneous Administration using a Minimal Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic Model. J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2018;21(1s):130s-148s. PubMed

184.Market Intelligence Report: Biologic Response Modifier Agents, 2015. Ottawa (ON): Patented Medicine Prices Review Board; 2016: https://www.pmprb-cepmb.gc.ca/view.asp?ccid=1286&lang=en. Accessed 2024 May 17.

185.Grant K. Oversight gap at private infusion clinics poses health risk, Ontario documents say. The Globe and Mail. 2018 Nov 11. https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-oversight-gap-at-private-infusion-clinics-poses-health-risk-ontario/. Accessed 2024 May 17.

186.Mattke S, Wang M, Ullrich A. Implications of Alzheimer's Treatment for Organization and Payment of Medical Practices in Canada. Los Angeles (CA): USC Dornsife Center for Economic and Social Research; 2021: https://cesr.usc.edu/sites/default/files/Implications_of_Alzheimers_Treatment_for_Organization_and_Payment_of_Medical%20_Practices_in_Canada.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 17.

187.Grundy Q, Hart D, Elkhalifa S, et al. Mapping the landscape of infusion care for people prescribed intravenous medicines in Canada [forthcoming].

188.CADTH Health Technology Review: Health System Readiness Report: The Availability of Privately Funded IV Infusion Clinics in Canada. Can J Health Technol. 2022;2(6). https://canjhealthtechnol.ca/index.php/cjht/article/view/372. Accessed 2024 May 20.

189.Schultz TJ, Thomas A, Georgiou P, et al. Developing a Model of Care for Home Infusions of Natalizumab for People With Multiple Sclerosis. J Infus Nurs. 2019;42(6):289-296. PubMed

190.Batist G, Ghedira S, Khan A, et al. Pcn252 Time-to-Treatment Initiation (Tti) in Community Infusion Clinics: Decreasing Wait Times for Canadian Oncology Patients. Value Health. 2020;23:S67.

191.Sekhon T, Tejani A. Ironing out the problem of outpatient infusion wait times: look for process improvements first [preprint]. Authorea. 2024. https://www.authorea.com/doi/full/10.22541/au.170670506.63555340/v1. Accessed 2024 May 21.

192.Baumann A, Crea-Arsenio M. The Crisis in the Nursing Labour Market: Canadian Policy Perspectives. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(13):1954. PubMed

193.Canada's nursing shortage at a glance: A media reference guide. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions; 2022: https://nursesunions.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/nurses_shortage_media_ref_guide_comp.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 21.

194.Jones AM, Favaro A. Why some worry about the rise of private agency health-care staffing firms in Canada. CTV News 2023 Oct 15; https://www.ctvnews.ca/health/why-some-worry-about-the-rise-of-private-agency-health-care-staffing-firms-in-canada-1.6600637. Accessed 2024 May 31.

195.Goodwin JS. Continuity of Care Matters in All Health Care Settings. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e213842. PubMed

196.Amjad H, Carmichael D, Austin AM, Chang C, Bynum JPW. Continuity of Care and Healthcare Utilization in Older Adults with Dementia in Fee-for-Service Medicare. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;176(9):1371-1378. PubMed

197.Spithoff S, McPhail B, Vesely L, Rowe RK, Mogic L, Grundy Q. How the commercial virtual care industry gathers, uses and values patient data: a Canadian qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2024;14(2):e074019. PubMed

198.Spithoff S, Grundy Q. Commercializing Personal Health Information: A Critical Qualitative Content Analysis of Documents Describing Proprietary Primary Care Databases in Canada. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2023;12:6938. PubMed

199.Alamer F, Alanazi AT. The Impact of Smart Pump Technology in the Healthcare System: A Scope Review. Cureus. 2023;15(3):e36007. PubMed

200.Sproul A, Newman H. Get Smart, Canada: Exploring Smart Pump Implementation, Management, and Compliance with Standards through a Nationwide Survey. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2023;76(3):185-195. PubMed

201.Giuliano KK, Mahuren RS, Balyeat J. Data-based program management of system-wide IV smart pump integration. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2024;81(1):e30-e36. PubMed

202.Mackenzie Health. Mackenzie Health launches first-of-its-kind technology in Canada designed to help reduce IV pump programming medication errors. 2024; https://www.mackenziehealth.ca/about-us/news/~368-Mackenzie-Health-launches-first-of-its-kind-technology-in-Canada-designed-to-help-reduce-IV-pump-programming-medication-errors. Accessed 2024 May 21.

203.Puolitaival A, Savola M, Tuomainen P, Asseburg C, Lundström T, Soini E. Advantages in Management and Remote Monitoring of Intravenous Therapy: Exploratory Survey and Economic Evaluation of Gravity-Based Infusions in Finland. Adv Ther. 2022;39(5):2096-2108. PubMed

204.Sperling RA, Jack CR, Jr., Black SE, et al. Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities in amyloid-modifying therapeutic trials: recommendations from the Alzheimer's Association Research Roundtable Workgroup. Alzheimers Dement. 2011;7(4):367-385. PubMed

205.Withington CG, Turner RS. Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities With Anti-amyloid Antibodies for the Treatment of Dementia Due to Alzheimer's Disease. Front Neurol. 2022;13:862369. PubMed

206.Jeong SY, Suh CH, Shim WH, Lim JS, Lee JH, Kim SJ. Incidence of Amyloid-Related Imaging Abnormalities in Patients With Alzheimer Disease Treated With Anti-beta-Amyloid Immunotherapy: A Meta-analysis. Neurology. 2022;99(19):e2092-e2101. PubMed

207.CADTH Health Technology Review: Wait List Strategies for CT and MRI Scans. Can J Health Technol. 2023;3(1). https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/attachments/2023-01/CM0002-HC0052-Wait-List%20Strategies-for-CT-and-MRI-Scans.pdf. Accessed 2024 May 27.

208.Doran SJ, Sawyer RP. Risk factors in developing amyloid related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and clinical implications. Front Neurosci. 2024;18:1326784. PubMed

209.Wang YY, Ge YJ, Tan CC, Cao XP, Tan L, Xu W. The Proportion of APOE4 Carriers Among Non-Demented Individuals: A Pooled Analysis of 389,000 Community-Dwellers. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;81(3):1331-1339. PubMed

210.Barnes LL, Bennett DA. Dementia: Cognitive resilience in APOE*epsilon4 carriers-is race important? Nat Rev Neurol. 2015;11(4):190-191. PubMed

211.Alzheimer Society of Canada. Genetic testing and Alzheimer's disease. [2024]; https://alzheimer.ca/en/about-dementia/what-alzheimers-disease/genetic-testing-alzheimers-disease. Accessed 2024 May 24.

212.Leqembi 100mg/ml concentrate for solution for infusion. Public Assessment Report. National Procedure. London (UK): Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency; 2024: https://mhraproducts4853.blob.core.windows.net/docs/6ed2db79b7202feb5a8edbecfa5c35bb434381e6. Accessed 2024 Oct 30.

213.Liu KY, Villain N, Ayton S, et al. Key questions for the evaluation of anti-amyloid immunotherapies for Alzheimer's disease. Brain Commun. 2023;5(3):fcad175. PubMed

214.Ontario’s first modular MRI department opens at Brockville. Canadian Healthcare Technology. 2023 Sep 20. https://www.canhealth.com/2023/09/20/ontarios-first-modular-mri-department-opens-at-brockville/. Accessed 2024 May 28.

215.Hyperfine. Leading Institutions Enroll First Alzheimer's Patients Receiving Amyloid-Targeting Therapy in CARE PMR Study. 2024; https://hyperfine.io/about/news/press-release-leading-institutions-enroll-first-alzheimers-patients-receiving-amyloid-targeting-therapy-in-care-pmr-study. Accessed 2024 May 30.

216.Hudson D, Sahibbil JP. Remote scanning support in magnetic resonance imaging: Friend or foe? Radiography (Lond). 2022;28(3):739-745. PubMed

217.MacLean T. A first look inside. A new, relocatable MRI funded by the QEII Foundation will be helping more patients receive their critical scan. QEII Health Sciences Centre Foundation 2024; https://qe2foundation.ca/our-impact/news/first-look-inside-new-relocatable-mri-funded-qeii-foundation-will-be-helping-more. Accessed 2024 Aug 12.

218.Ahmed A. The Case for a Pan-Canadian Teleradiology Network. Policy Magazine. 2023 Dec 6. https://www.policymagazine.ca/the-case-for-a-pan-canadian-teleradiology-network/. Accessed 2024 May 28.

219.Hampel H, Gao P, Cummings J, et al. The foundation and architecture of precision medicine in neurology and psychiatry. Trends Neurosci. 2023;46(3):176-198. PubMed

220.Wailoo A. Appendix D: Estimates of the size of the English eligible population in for amyloid targeting therapies in Alzheimer’s Disease. In: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), ed. Potential issues and challenges in evaluation of disease-modifying dementia treatments: HTA Innovation Laboratory Report. Sheffield (UK): School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield; 2023: https://www.nice.org.uk/Media/Default/About/what-we-do/HTA%20Lab/Appendix-D.pdf. Accessed 2024 Jul 12.

221.Verger A, Yakushev I, Albert NL, et al. FDA approval of lecanemab: the real start of widespread amyloid PET use? - the EANM Neuroimaging Committee perspective. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2023;50(6):1553-1555. PubMed

222.van Dyck CH, Swanson CJ, Aisen P, et al. Lecanemab in Early Alzheimer's Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(1):9-21. PubMed

223.Sims JR, Zimmer JA, Evans CD, et al. Donanemab in Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease: The TRAILBLAZER-ALZ 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023;330(6):512-527. PubMed

224.AlzForum. Rising Leqembi Prescriptions Are Straining Clinic Capacity. 2024; https://www.alzforum.org/news/research-news/rising-leqembi-prescriptions-are-straining-clinic-capacity. Accessed 2024 Oct 31.

225.Mila-Aloma M, Ashton NJ, Shekari M, et al. Plasma p-tau231 and p-tau217 as state markers of amyloid-beta pathology in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Nat Med. 2022;28(9):1797-1801. PubMed

226.Roberts R, Knopman DS. Classification and epidemiology of MCI. Clin Geriatr Med. 2013;29(4):753-772. PubMed

227.Manly JJ, Tang MX, Schupf N, Stern Y, Vonsattel JP, Mayeux R. Frequency and course of mild cognitive impairment in a multiethnic community. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(4):494-506. PubMed

228.Anstey KJ, Cherbuin N, Eramudugolla R, et al. Characterizing mild cognitive disorders in the young-old over 8 years: prevalence, estimated incidence, stability of diagnosis, and impact on IADLs. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9(6):640-648. PubMed

229.Glynn K, O'Callaghan M, Hannigan O, et al. Clinical utility of mild cognitive impairment subtypes and number of impaired cognitive domains at predicting progression to dementia: A 20-year retrospective study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;36(1):31-37. PubMed

230.Petersen RC, Aisen P, Boeve BF, et al. Mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer disease in the community. Ann Neurol. 2013;74(2):199-208. PubMed

231.Ravaglia G, Forti P, Montesi F, et al. Mild cognitive impairment: epidemiology and dementia risk in an elderly Italian population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008;56(1):51-58. PubMed

232.Solfrizzi V, Panza F, Colacicco AM, et al. Vascular risk factors, incidence of MCI, and rates of progression to dementia. Neurology. 2004;63(10):1882-1891. PubMed

233.Knopman DS, Gottesman RF, Sharrett AR, et al. Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia Prevalence: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Neurocognitive Study (ARIC-NCS). Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016;2:1-11. PubMed

234.Lee SH, Lee JH, Byun MS, et al. Comparison of Amyloid Positivity Rate and Accumulation Pattern between Amnestic and Non-Amnestic Type Mild Cognitive Impairment. Psychiatry Investig. 2020;17(6):603-607. PubMed

235.Kim JY, Lim JH, Jeong YJ, Kang DY, Park KW. The Effect of Clinical Characteristics and Subtypes on Amyloid Positivity in Patients with Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment. Dement Neurocogn Disord. 2019;18(4):130-137. PubMed

236.Public Health Agency of Canada. Dementia: Overview. 2024; https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/diseases/dementia.html. Accessed 2024 Aug 5.

237.Alzheimer's Association. 2020 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures. Alzheimers Dement. 2020;16(3):391-460.

238.Yuan J, Maserejian N, Liu Y, et al. Severity Distribution of Alzheimer's Disease Dementia and Mild Cognitive Impairment in the Framingham Heart Study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2021;79(2):807-817. PubMed

239.Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C, et al. Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. JAMA. 2019;321(13):1286-1294. PubMed

240.Public Health Agency of Canada. Canadian Chronic Disease Surveillance System (CCDSS). 2024; https://health-infobase.canada.ca/ccdss/data-tool/Index?G=00&V=16&M=4&Y=2021. Accessed 2024 Aug 16.

241.Jonsson L, Wimo A, Handels R, et al. The affordability of lecanemab, an amyloid-targeting therapy for Alzheimer's disease: an EADC-EC viewpoint. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2023;29:100657. PubMed

242.Jansen WJ, Janssen O, Tijms BM, et al. Prevalence Estimates of Amyloid Abnormality Across the Alzheimer Disease Clinical Spectrum. JAMA Neurol. 2022;79(3):228-243. PubMed

Appendix 1: Additional Information on Blood-Based Biomarkers for AD

Please note that this appendix has not been copy-edited.

Examples of some of the strengths and weaknesses of emerging biomarkers:

Appendix 2: Methodology for Estimation of Treatable Population With Incident Early-Stage AD

Please note that this appendix has not been copy-edited.

Treatable Patient Population Estimation

To facilitate the adaptation of the NICE model to the context of Canada, a literature scan was undertaken to find incidence rates and proportions for each calculation stage, from individuals aged older than 65 through to those receiving treatment. Where updated studies could not be found, the same studies in the NICE report were used for their equivalent calculation stage. These estimates could increase if those who have prevalent AD and those under the age of 65 with cognitive symptoms sought treatment.

To accommodate ranges of incidence and proportions, upper and lower estimates were calculated for each stage of the patient pathway using the NICE approach for MCI and mild dementia due to AD (Tables A1 and A2, respectively). The midrange results were presented in the Treatable Patient Population Estimation section with methodology detailed in this section for MCI and mild dementia due to AD.

Mild Cognitive Impairment

For calculating stage I (incidence of underlying condition), an annual MCI incidence of 5.1% was applied to the 2020 starting population of Canadians aged 65 years or older. This value comes from a table in Roberts et al. that reported a variety of incidence rates among different age cohorts.226 The listed 5.1% annual MCI incidence rate was from Manly et al. from a racially diverse cohort of people aged 65 years or older in the US.227 Calculating MCI incidence is a novel addition to the methodology used in the NICE report which only examined prevalence of MCI.21

For calculating stage II (proportion presenting to health care), Anstey et al. reported that 13.3% of those with MCI presented to health care.228 Anstey et al. was used in the NICE report and is a study following a cohort of Australian participants who were assessed every 4 years for MCI.

For calculating stage III (assessment and diagnosis of early-stage AD), Glynn et al. reports 55% of MCI cases are amnestic.229 Amnestic MCI is a subtype of MCI that progresses to AD and is likely caused by underlying AD etiology. Glynn et al. is a 20-year retrospective study of MCI patients at a memory clinic.229

For calculating stage 4 (treatment eligibility assessment), Petersen et al. reports 57.1% of MCI cases show amyloid positivity.230 Petersen et al. examined a cohort of amnestic MCI patients from the Mayo Clinic Study on Aging and examined AD biomarkers, including amyloid positivity.230

Mild Dementia Due to AD

For calculating stage I (incidence of underlying condition), this statistic comes from the Government of Canada’s web page on dementia and had the same parameters (statistic was for those aged 65 years or older in 2020 to 2021 with dementia of any kind).236

For calculating stage II (proportion presenting to health care), Lang et al. reported that 38.3% of those with dementia presented to health care.34 Lang et al. was used in the NICE report and is a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the prevalence of undetected dementia in communities.34

For calculating stage III (assessment and diagnosis of early-stage AD), a two-step process was done. First, it was assumed that 70% of dementia cases were due to underlying AD etiology from the 2020 Alzheimer’s Association fact sheet.237 Second, Yuan et al. found that 50.4% of Alzheimer patients had mild dementia due to AD.238 Yuan et al. was a study examining the distribution of Alzheimer severity among participants of the Framingham Heart Study.238

For calculating stage 4 (treatment eligibility assessment), Rabinovici et al. reports 70.1% of mild dementia cases due to AD show amyloid positivity.239

Table 5: Upper and Lower Ranges of Estimates for Treatable Population in Canada With Incident MCI From 2020 to 2021

Stage

Upper Estimate

% of starting population

Source

Midrange Estimate

% of starting population

Source

Lower Estimate

% of starting population

Source

2020

People 65 years or older in Canada

6,809,521

          —

StatsCan 65+ (2020)12

6,809,521

StatsCan 65+ (2020)12

6,809,521

StatsCan 65+ (2020)12

Incidence of underlying condition

522,971

7.7%

Ravaglia et al. (76.8/1000 person-years)231 from Roberts et al.226

347,286

5.1%

Manly et al. (5.1% annual incidence)227 from Roberts et al.226

146,405

2.2%

Solfrizzi et al. (21.5/1000 person- years)232 from Roberts et al.226

Proportion presenting to health care

69,555

1.0%

13.3% from Anstey et al.228

46,189

0.7%

13.3% from Anstey et al.228

19,472

0.3%

13.3% from Anstey et al.228

Assessment and diagnosis of early-stage Alzheimer disease

52,166

0.8%

75% from Knopmann et al.233

25,404

0.4%

55% from Glynn et al.229

10,710

0.2%

55% from Glynn et al.229

Treatment eligibility assessment

33,751

0.5%

64.7% from Lee et al.234

14,506

0.2%

57.1% from Petersen et al.230

4,391

0.1%

41% from Kim et al.235

2021

People 65 years or older in Canada

7,045,990

StatsCan 65+ (2021)12

7,045,990

StatsCan 65+ (2021)12

7,045,990

StatsCan 65+ (2021)12

Incidence of underlying condition

541,132

7.7%

Ravaglia et al. (76.8/1000 person-years)231 from Roberts et al.226

359,345

5.1%

Manly et al. (5.1% annual incidence)227 from Roberts et al.226

151,489

2.2

Solfrizzi et al. (21.5/1000 person- years)232 from Roberts et al.226

Proportion presenting to health care

71,971

1.0%

13.3% from Anstey et al.228

47,793

0.7%

13.3% from Anstey et al.228

20,148

0.3

13.3% from Anstey et al.228

Assessment and diagnosis of early-stage Alzheimer disease

53,978

0.8%

75% from Knopmann et al.233

26,286

0.4%

55% from Glynn et al.229

11,081

0.2

55% from Glynn et al.229

Treatment eligibility assessment

34,924

0.5%

64.7% from Lee et al.234

15,009

0.2%

57.1% from Petersen et al.230

4,543

0.1

41% from Kim et al.235

Table 6: Upper and Lower Ranges of Estimates for Treatable Population in Canada With Incident Mild Dementia Due to AD From 2020 to 2021

Stage

Upper Estimate

% of starting population

Source

Midrange Estimate

% of starting population

Source

Lower Estimate

% of starting population

Source

2020

People 65 years or older in Canada

6,809,521

StatsCan 65+ (2020)12

6,809,521

StatsCan 65+ (2020)12

6,809,521

StatsCan 65+ (2020)12

Incidence of underlying condition

124,000

1.8%

Alzheimer Society of Canada Landmark Report (likely includes those under 65)1

86,000

1.3%

Government of Canada ‘Dementia: Overview’236

82,872

1.2%

Crude incidence rate of dementia (1,217/100K) from CCDSS for 2020 to 2021240

Proportion presenting to health care

55,800

0.8%

45% from Lang et al.34

32,938

0.5%

38.3% from Lang et al.34

20,718

0.3%

25% from World Alzheimer Report 202160

Assessment and diagnosis of early-stage Alzheimer disease

25,891

0.4%

(80% from 2020 Alzheimer’s Association fact sheet)237 x (58% from Jonsson et al.)241

11,621

0.2%

(70% from 2020 Alzheimer’s Association fact sheet)237 x (50.4% from Yuan et al.)238

5,967

0.1%

(60% from 2020 Alzheimer’s Association fact sheet)237 x (48% from Jonsson et al.)241

Treatment eligibility assessment

22,007

0.3%

85% from Jansen et al.242

8,146

0.1%

70.1% from Rabinovici et al.239

4,183

0.06%

70.1% from Rabinovici et al.239

2021

People 65 years or older in Canada

7,045,990

StatsCan 65+ (2021)12

7,045,990

StatsCan 65+ (2021)12

7,045,990

StatsCan 65+ (2021)12

Incidence of underlying condition

92,725

1.3%

Crude incidence rate of dementia (1,316/100K) from CCDSS for 2021 to 2022240

92,091

1.3%

Crude incidence rate of dementia (1,307/100K) from CCDSS for 2021 to 2022240

91,527

1.3%

Crude incidence rate of dementia (1,299/100K) from CCDSS for 2021 to 2022240

Proportion presenting to health care

41,726

0.6%

45% from Lang et al.34

35,271

0.5%

38.3% from Lang et al.34

22,882

0.3%

25% from World Alzheimer Report 202160

Assessment and diagnosis of early-stage Alzheimer disease

19,361

0.3%

(80% from 2020 Alzheimer’s Association fact sheet)237 x (58% from Jonsson et al.)241

12,444

0.2%

(70% from 2020 Alzheimer’s Association fact sheet)237 x (50.4% from Yuan et al.)238

6,590

0.1%

(60% from 2020 Alzheimer’s Association fact sheet)237 x (48% from Jonsson et al.)241

Treatment eligibility assessment

16,457

0.2%

85% from Jansen et al.242

8,723

0.1%

70.1% from Rabinovici et al.239

4,620

0.07%

70.1% from Rabinovici et al.239

Estimation of Medical Imaging Demand

After estimating the incident treatable population eligible to receive anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs for early-stage AD, estimates of the number of PET-CT and MRI exams were calculated and matched to the domains of the patient pathway for AD. This is a new extension to the work done in the NICE report. It should be noted that while CT exams may be used to rule out other causes of dementia in patients, it is insufficient for determining treatment eligibility, so it was excluded from the estimation.

For PET-CT exams, Verger et al. reported that up to 33% of patients are not able to receive LP to determine amyloid positivity and will need a PET-CT exam.221 This was applied to the estimated incident population eligible for treatment (22,652) to get 7,475 potential PET-CT exams. Verger et al. is a position paper put forward by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine Neuroimaging Committee which cites a study noting that up to one-third of patients may require amyloid PET over LP to determine amyloid positivity.221

For MRI exams, a baseline MRI exam is required during treatment eligibility assessment to ensure that patients’ brain structures are not at high risk of adverse events, leading to 22,652 baseline scans. This has been a requirement in countries that have approved anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs.28,29 In addition, at least 2 MRI exams are taken within the first year of treatment to monitor for the development of adverse events, leading to an additional 45,304 scans, for a total of 67,956 exams if no adverse events occur. In some countries that have approved the use of anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs, this can be up to 3 MRI exams, potentially adding another 22,652 exams.28,29

However, if an adverse event were to occur, MRI monitoring exams would increase to once every 2 to 4 months. Jeong et al. reports an adverse event incidence rate of 6.5%, with the majority of cases resolving within 4 months.206 Assuming an incidence rate of 6.5% and that cases resolve within 4 months with a monitoring rate of 1 MRI scan every 2 months, this leads to an additional 2,944 MRI exams. This leads to an estimated 70,900 MRI exams.

Estimating Future Demand

After estimating the incident treatable population eligible to receive anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs for early-stage AD, and the number of PET-CT and MRI exams to support treatment, a 5-year projection was estimated. This is a new extension to the work done in the NICE report to assist in capacity planning.

Several key assumptions underpin the 5-year projection. Subsequent changes to these assumptions would affect the numbers. The assumptions used to create the initial treatable incident population estimate and medical imaging demand estimate were carried forward into the calculations made for the projection.

The percent increase in incidence rate between 2020 to 2021 was calculated and applied to each subsequent year. This assumes a constant incidence rate increase which may not necessarily be accurate as more people with cognitive symptoms could seek health care if there was a treatment available for them. Additionally, it was assumed that patients would receive anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs for 2 years before AD progression removed them from treatment eligibility. It remains unclear how long patients will be able to remain on anti–amyloid-beta mAb DMTs.21,213 Furthermore, it was assumed that patients would undergo annual treatment eligibility assessments to ensure they are still able to receive treatment.21 This means that those who received PET-CT exams previously would receive another for each year of treatment. It was also assumed that those who experienced an ARIA event within the first year of treatment will require an additional MRI exam 1 year after treatment initiation.